AWAS! HATI-HATI MENITI NERAKA DUNIA SEBELUM KIAMAT!

BAPA REFORMASI "TO HELL AND BACK"

BAPA REFORMASI

SEMINAR YANG OTAI TULIS DALAM BLOGNYA IAITU SEMINAR MENGENAI MENGURUS PENDAPAT UMUM REFORMASI DI INDONESIA DAN SEMINAR MASADEPAN MENGENAI “FREEDOM OF THE PRESS” SERTA KEARAH PEMBENTUKAN MAJLIS MEDIA NEGARA AMAT MENCABAR MINDA KITA YANG MAMPU BERFIKIR TENTANG LIBERALISASI YANG DIBAWA OLEH GLOBALISASI YANG BERPAKSIKAN NILAI2 AMERIKA SERTA NILAI EROPAH. DUA BENUA INILAH YANG MELETAKKAN NILAI. PIAWAIAN, KPI, ISO DAN LAIN-LAIN NILAI KUALITI MENGENAI LIBERALISASI.

LIBERALISASI INI PULA MERUPAKAN MANIFESTASI GAGASAN BANGSA-BANGSA BERSATU SEMENJAK 1945 LAGI YANG MENGANDUNGI PIAGAM HUMAN RIGHT, SAMA RATA, ADIL, TELUS, GLOBAL, PERSAMAAN DAN NILAI2 LAIN YANG ANTI UNDANG2, PERATURAN, REGULASI, ADAT, BUDAYA TEMPATAN DLL. NAK MAJU DAN MODEN MAKA KITA KENA GLOBAL. NAK GLOBAL KITA KENA LIBERALISASIKAN DIRI KITA HINGGA MENJADI MANUSIA YANG BEBAS TANPA ADAB SERTA UNDANG2.

INILAH BUDAYA MADANI GLOBAL YANG LIBERAL YANG CUBA DITERAP OLEH KAWAN2 KITA NAMPAKNYA YANG ANJURKAN KEADILAN, PERSAMAAN HAK, SAMA RATA, KETUANAN RAKYAT, PEOPLES POWER, MALAYSIAN MALAYSIA DLL SEHINGGA YANG MELAYU DAH TAK NGAKU DIANYA MELAYU, TETAPI BANGGA DENGAN SUKU2 YANG KECIL SEPERTI JAWA, MAMAK, PAKISTAN, ARAB, TURKI, SIAM, CINA, INDIA DLL YANG ADA DISINI AKIBAT KAWIN CAMPUR ANTARA MELAYU DAN BANGSA-BANGSA DARI BENUA LAIN INI. MELAYU INI AKIBAT TERPESONA DENGAN LIBERALISASI LUPA HAK DAN DEFINASI BANGSA MEREKA YANG ADA DALAM PERLEMBAGAAN. DAN DENGAN BODOH SOMBONG MENGATAKAN MEREKA BUKAN MELAYU…. MEREKA SAMA PENDATANG DENGAN KETURUNAN YANG ASALNYA DARI BENUA ASING YANG JAUH DATANGNYA DARIPADA KEPULAUAN RUMPUN MELAYU ATAU MELAYU RAYA.

KENAPA TAK PERCAYA? INGAT ABE NAK KECEK DEMO KE? BACALAH DEFINASI DARI WIKIPEDIA ENCYLOPEDIA INI… PERGILAH KE USA DAN KOTA2 BESAR SELURUH EROPAH… BUATLAH KAJIAN SENDIRI JANGAN PAKAI ORANG HASUT KITA TU… ITU HASUTAN TALI BARUT YANG TAK TAHU LAH KITA APA UPAH YANG DIA ORANG DAPAT!

DEFINASINYA  ADALAH:

In general, liberalization (or liberalisation) refers to a relaxation of previous government restrictions, usually in areas of social or economic policy. Liberalization of autocratic regimes may precede democratization (or not, as in the case of the Prague Spring).

In the arena of social policy it may refer to a relaxation of laws restricting for example divorce, abortion, homosexuality or drugs.

Most often, the term is used to refer to economic liberalization, especially trade liberalization or capital market liberalization.

Liberalization and privatization

Although economic liberalization is often associated with privatization, the two can be quite separate processes. For example, the European Union has liberalized gas and electricity markets, instituting a system of competition; but some of the leading European energy companies (such as EDF and Vattenfall) remain partially or completely in government ownership.

Liberalized and privatized public services may be dominated by just a few big companies, particularly in sectors with high capital costs, or high sunk cost, such as water, gas and electricity. In some cases they may remain legal monopolies, at least for some part of the market (e.g. small consumers).

Liberalization is one of three focal points (the others being privatization and stabilization) of the Washington consensus’s trinity strategy for economies in transition. An example of Liberalization is the “Washington Consensus” which was a set of policies created and used by Argentina.

Liberalization vs Democratization

There is a distinct difference between liberalization and democratization, which are often thought to be the same concept. Liberalization can take place without democratization, and deals with a combination of policy and social change specialized to a certain issue such as the liberalization of government-held property for private purchase, whereas democratization is more politically specialized that can arise from a liberalization, but works in a broader level of government.

MACAM MANA TAK PERCAYA LAGI WAHAI MEREKA YANG MABUK LIBERALISASI, REFORMASI DAN SI SI… CINA BILANG SI TU…. MATI…MAMPUS…BAHAM TANAH… JILAT MATA CHOK.

KEMEPEN LIBERALISASI INI KALAU KITA TAK BIJAKSANA DAN CERMAT MAKA JADILAH MAKANAN ORANG CERDEK… ORANG BODOH ADALAH MAKANAN SI CERDEK……

DI MALAYSIA NI SIAPA YANG PALING KAYA, CERDEK, KOMPETEN, MAHIR DALAM SEMUA BIDANG SERTA MONOPOLI DALAM EKONOMI, KEWANGAN DAN HAL2 KUATKAN KUASA SERTA PENGARAUH? JAWABLAH SENDIRI…. SEBAB SEMUA BIJAK2 DI MALAYSIA NI!

KALAU DI ARENA GLOBAL SIAP YANG BIJAK? SIAPA YANG BERTAMADDUN DAN JELIK MATA DULU? SIAPA YANG TENTUKAN AGENDA DUNIA NI? JAWABLAH…… TENTU BUKAN MELAYU ATAU BUMIPUTRA KAN!

DALAM ISLAM PULAK… KALAU PAS TU BIJAK DIA AKAN DAPAT KESAN IDEA REFORMASI DAN LIBERALISASI BARAT NI APA? ISLAMIK KE? LEBIH JAHAT DARI UMNO DAN BN KE YANG SAMPAI TAK BOLEH NAK MUQABBALAH DAN BERKONGSI KUASA POLITIK?

SEBENARNYA SEBELUM KIAMAT ATAU HAMPIR KIAMAT MEMANG AKAN WUJUD MASYARAKAT MADANI BARAT YANG TAK ADA UNDANG2, ADAB, TATASUSILA, TIADA AGAMA, DLL TERMASUKLAH TIADA TALI KEKELUARGAAN YANG NORMAL BILA JANTAN KAWIN SAMA JANTAN DAN BETINA KAWIN SAMA BETINA,,,, DAH TU BUAT SEKS DI MANA SAJA DENGAN SIAPA SAJA MACAM HAIWAN DAH…. LEMBU DAN KAMBING PUN NANTI TENGOK APA KITA BUAT DALAM SEMAK MACAM MEREKA… HAHAHA….

YANG PENTING KEPADA PRESS, MEDIA, BLOG DAN BANGSA KU, MARILAH KITA BUAT TRASFORMASI “SELF CENCORSHIP” DAN TINGKATKAN JATIDIRI SERTA KREDIBILITI KITA DENGAN ADAB SERTA SUSILA ORANG TIMUR…. IKUT PERLEMBAGAAN SERTA RUKUN NEGARA.

APA ITU “Self-censorship?”

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Self-censorship is the act of censoring or classifying one’s own work (blog, book(s), film(s), or other means of expression), out of fear or deference to the sensibilities of others without an authority directly pressuring one to do so. Self-censorship is often practiced by film producers, film directors, publishers, news anchors, journalists, musicians, and other kinds of authors.

In authoritarian countries, creators of artworks may remove material that their government might find controversial for fear of sanction by their governments. In democratic countries, self-censorship can also occur, particularly in order to conform to the expectations of the market. For example, the editor of a periodical may consciously or unconsciously avoid topics that will anger advertisers or a parent company in order to protect their livelihood.

News media are often accused of self-censorship because news media can face serious backlash for controversial or hasty reporting. On following this public demand, news media have been accused of “not taking any risks.” For example, certain organizations (Media Matters for America, FAIR, Democracy Now!, and the ACLU) have raised concerns about news broadcasting stations (notably FOX News) censoring their own content to be less controversial when reporting on the War on Terror. However, this is not always attributed to self-censorship; there have been attempts by the authorities to pressure news organizations to withhold particular public information in the name of security.[1] There have also been instances beginning with the Gulf War and in subsequent conflicts, where journalists have actively sought censorship advice from military authorities in order to prevent the inadvertent revelation of military secrets.

“Self-censorship” can also be found in scientific publications. Usually, a scientist can feel discouraged from releasing their findings because of a popular ideology or political agenda. Examples of self-censorship in scientific publications that have been criticized as politically motivated include scientists under the Third Reich withholding findings that disagreed with the commonly-held beliefs in differences between races, or the refusal of these scientists under Hitler to support General Relativity (which got the reputation as “Jewish science”). Economists under the communist regime in the former Soviet Union would never voice their criticisms of a socialized economy; this is a clear example of self-censorship. More recently, certain scientists have withheld their findings related to climate changes caused by pollution and to endangered species.[2][3][4] Professor Heinz Klatt claims that political correctness has resulted in widespread self-censorship on topics like homosexuality, (learning) disabilities, Islam, as well as sexual, racial, and genetic differences.[5]

Taste and decency are also areas which often raise questions on self-censorship. Debates involving images or footage of murder, terrorism, war and massacres cause complaints as to the purpose to which they are put. Editors will frequently censor these images to avoid charges of prurience, shock tactics or invasion of privacy.

WAJAH MANUSIA DI NERAKA DUNIA

WAJAH MANUSIA DI NERAKA DUNIA

LIBERALISASI PRESS UNTUK BARAT?

LIBERALISASI PRESS UNTUK BARAT?

WAHAI ADEK KU SERTA BANGSA MALAYSIA KU YANG MENGAKU BIJAKSANA DAN GLOBAL SERTA LEBIH MAT SALLAEH DARI ORANG PUTIH SERTA HANYA BERPENDIDIKAN US, AUSTRALIA ATAU ENGLAND DLL….. KAJILAH LAGI BAB LIBERALISASI DAN REFORMASI INI DENGAN SEMUA PANDANGAN. KALAU ABE TAK BETUL BANTAI ABE DALAM BLOG NI CUKUP2……. INGAT BANGSA KITA ADA JATIDIRI DAN BUDAYA KITA. KITA NAK ADA SEKOLAH CINA, TAMIL, MELAYU, ARAB, SEKOLAH KRISTIAN, BUDDHA DLL…. BUDAYA PUN BEGITU. KALAU LAKSANA LIBERALISASI DAN REFORMASI BARAT NI…. DAPATKAH KITA SEMUA YANG KITA ADA SEKARANG INI….? JAWAP!

TULISAN AKAN DATANG ABE MASUKAN LAGU GLOBAL, LIBERALISASI DAN REFORMASI YANG MEMBUNUH KESUCIAN BUDAYA KITA, ORANG MALAYSIA. NAK JADI AMERIKA? KENALAH HIDUP DAN BERFIKIR CARA AMERIKA. JANGAN HIDUP CARA AMERIKA TAPI BUDAYA KAMPONG SEPERTI BERAK TEPI PANTAI ATAU ATAS JULAI YANG CONDONG DALAM SUNGAI…. KATA PUAN MAHANI KALAU BERAK DITEPI PANTAI BUKAN KITA TENGOK TELUR PENYU TAPI PENYU GELAK KAT TELOR KITA. BEGITU JUGALAH BERAK KAT BATANG KAYU BERJUNTAI TU…. IKAN NAMPAK BATA** AWANG DOK BERJUNTAI… ATAU TERJUNTAI-JUNTAI. KALU MEK LAGU MANO PULKO…..?

ITULAH LAWAK LUCAH YANG ABE SHARE DENGAN ADINDA MAHANI YUSOFF KAT PRIMULA BATU BURUK, KUALA TERENGGANU BARU2 INI KERANA SEMINAR DI SANA. NAK TAHU APA TOK SHABEERY CHEEK, MENTERI PENERANGAN SEBUT PASAL “AGENT OF CHANGE?”…. TUNGGUUUUUU….!

DUNI DIJADIKAN SYURGA ATAU NERAKA?

DUNIA DIJADIKAN SYURGA ATAU NERAKA?

:

3 comments so far

  1. Museum Supplier on

    biar betul

  2. malaysia vacations on

    best la blog ni

  3. abdul hamid on

    aku sih pilih neraka dunia saja, karena penjaganya bisa diajak damai, apalagi kita dapat menguasai mereka neraka menjadi lahan pencarian kita, dari pada neraka yang sesungguhnya hanya allah yang tahu sejauh mana kemampuan menahan neraka yangs sesungguhnya, salam kenal dengan salah satu pengintip neraka, hee hheee


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: